|
|||||
| Return to original view | |||||
Across the UW System: Budget cuts are hurting studentsMADISON―The UW System made great efforts this year to manage $250 million in budget cuts while minimizing erosion of the quality for which the university is known. But in the end, the negatives are far outweighing the positives. The 2003-05 state budget forced the UW System to reduce faculty and staff by 650 positions. In doing so, each UW campus took steps to maintain instructional capacity by taking greater position cuts in other areas – academic support, physical plant and administration. Student instruction and support services were largely protected this year, but eliminating these positions is an ongoing challenge for UW campuses. In other good news, UW-Green Bay reports that the campus had a record enrollment of full-time equivalent students this Fall semester. The record is especially notable as UW-Green Bay was among the first campuses in the UW System to close applications for the Fall 2003 semester. Despite these examples of progress during tight financial times, the detrimental effects of budget cuts are much more widespread. Student servicesPositions in many non-instructional areas have had to remain vacant, and slower service is readily apparent in many administrative areas. Reductions in central student services administrative offices at UW-Madison meant a loss of key student services positions and fewer resources to improve the processing of freshman and new student transfers. In addition, several offices that provide a broad range of direct services to students now have fewer staff to provide these important services, including the UW-Madison Student Organization Office, the Multicultural Student Center, and the McBurney Disability Resource Center. Other examples include:
Course offeringsBudget cuts have also forced downsizing of course offerings, slowed graduation cycles, and limited public service support and cooperative efforts with businesses and industries. For example:
Classroom changesDue to reductions in full-time faculty positions, UW campuses have increased hiring of teaching academic staff or ad hoc staff. While competent instructors, academic and ad hoc staff do not typically advise students, nor do they serve on committees. These reductions have meant full-time faculty are taking on more advisees and committee appointments, resulting in less time for students and less consistent advising. In addition, cutbacks have meant significant growth in the size of classes at some campuses, reducing the chances students have to work one-on-one with faculty members. At UW-Oshkosh, for example, most class sizes were required to increase by approximately 10-15 percent. TechnologyReductions to technology resulted in a systemwide slow-down of the current replacement cycle for desktop computers, as well as reduced hours of operation for student computer labs and less technical support for students on campus. Examples include:
LibrariesOverall reductions to campus library budgets have meant fewer book purchases, serial subscriptions, databases, microfilm and reference books that support research and instruction. For example, UW-Madison’s General Library System was required to cut over $100,000 in GPR from its collections budget. At UW-Stout, approximately 200 books, videos and CDs will not be purchased for the Library Learning Center main collection, despite requests for these items from faculty seeking support their teaching and research on an ongoing basis. Campus facilitiesSystemwide, campuses have had to cut down on custodial and maintenance services due to reductions to physical plant and facilities departments. For example:
Are you feeling the effects of budget cuts on your campus? E-mail wisconsinideas@uwsa.edu to share your story. |
|||||
|
Home | Archive | Search | Comments | News & Events | UW System Direct questions or comments to wisconsinideas@uwsa.edu |
|||||